Services/Gas monetisation and pipelines
We screen and mature gas projects in markets where the feed, the pipeline and the price are all moving: mini-LNG, CNG, gas-to-power and pipeline supply. Each case is tested against a material and energy balance and a financing case that says which inputs are still assumptions.
Nigeria produced about 7.5 billion cubic feet of gas a day in 2025 against a 2030 target of 12. It flared about 302 billion cubic feet between January 2025 and June 2026 (Decade of Gas Secretariat and NUPRC data as reported, 2026). The regulator says about half of the flare commercialisation awardees have made real progress. The domestic base price for power moved to USD 2.18 per MMBtu on 1 April 2026, and the government has said fixed pricing will end within two years. Each of these facts changes a project's cash flow. None of them sits inside a vendor's process guarantee.
We connect the parts that are usually studied apart. Feed composition and liquids recovery set the product yield. Plant fuel and availability set what is left to sell. The pipeline or trucking route sets the delivered cost. The offtake terms and the price regime set the revenue. Where the balance does not close, we say so and list the measurements, laboratory results, vendor guarantees and agreements that would close it.
Pipeline concepts start from the pressure envelope. A line size picked from a nominal flow rate alone is a guess. Minimum source pressure, required delivery pressure, demand variation and future capacity decide the diameter, or show that compression is needed.
What leaves the plant to sell
Feed gas less treatment losses, liquids, plant fuel and flare, at the availability the plant achieves.
Conceptual, not for constructionPipeline supply, small-scale LNG, CNG, liquids recovery and captive power compared on one basis: delivered cost, product specification, availability and counterparty.
Gas characterisation, treatment requirements, product yield and the material and energy balance, with each input marked as measured, vendor-stated or assumed.
Candidate diameters against pressure cases, velocity and erosion limits, and the interfaces for metering, safeguarding, pigging and corrosion control. A list of the data FEED will need.
Feed gas terms, offtake assumptions, capital and operating cost, financing sensitivities, and the gates between a screening case and an investment-ready project.
Concept and pre-FEED studies are issued as conceptual, not for construction. Modelled returns are screening results until the technical and commercial gaps are closed.
A concept and pre-FEED study that compared candidate diameters across the full pressure envelope before fixing the line size, and set out the FEED deliverables with the data each needs.
Met4 of 4 success criteriaAssos studyRead the caseWest Africa·Desktop and pre-FEEDFeed composition, liquids recovery, plant fuel, product specification, capital and offtake brought into one study basis and one financial model, with every input marked measured, vendor-stated or assumed.
Met4 of 4 success criteriaAssos studyRead the caseA technical question, a train that will not stabilise, a water balance that will not close, a data room that will not reconcile. Describe it in a paragraph and we will propose the scope.
hello@assostechltd.com · 5 South Charlotte Street, Edinburgh, EH2 4AN