Services/Produced water, flow assurance and flowline integrity
On a mature field, water handling, scale and flowline condition decide how much oil you can move. We build the water balance for each disposal route, confirm scale before anyone treats it, and keep replacement, service tests and risk on one timeline for each well.
Produced water is usually the first limit a brownfield project hits and the last one anyone models. Move wells or raise liquid throughput and the bottleneck shifts to a treatment skid, a disposal pump, an injection well or an evaporation pond. We track seven streams separately: water generated and separated by train; water treated or transferred; water injected for disposal; water re-injected for pressure support; water sent to ponds; oil-in-water excursions and recycles; and outages, pump availability and disposal pressure. Injectivity is taken at the actual wellhead pressure, never at nameplate.
Scale work starts with the trends and ends with a post-job review. A rising differential pressure across a choke or a flowline is a hypothesis. Rate, temperature, choke position, reservoir change, emulsion, sand and instrument health all have to be ruled out before a flush or a workover is approved.
Flowline integrity is run as a programme, not a list. For each line we hold the condition and risk from the integrity system, the service test history, the replacement scope and priority, and the survey, construction, completion, test and handover dates, planned against actual, joined to the well it serves.
Where the water goes
Produced water routes on a water-flooded field. Each route has its own capacity, pressure and way to fail.
Conceptual, not for constructionOil, water and gas by facility. Available treatment and disposal by route. Where the shortfall is and which wells it affects.
Oil-in-water sampling and analysers, interface control in dehydrators and separators, transfer metering accuracy, N+1 pump capacity, and the fallback route when a pump trips or an injection well fails.
Trend alerts, a location hypothesis (choke, flowline or both), field inspection and samples, chemistry and inhibitor history, a targeted work order, controlled treatment and a post-job review.
Ranking by integrity risk, production value and overlap with other scope. Risk exports, service tests and replacement milestones brought into one record per well.
Glass-reinforced epoxy and polymer line manuals are generic references until a line-specific rating, joint detail and material approval exist.
Water balances are built from your daily summaries and test data with a stated reference date. Scale and flowline registers are refreshed weekly during a campaign.
Seven water streams tracked separately at each facility, disposal headroom taken at actual injection pressure, and the oil effect of each water limit stated.
Met4 of 4 success criteriaOperator engagementRead the caseMiddle East·Integrity programmeA flowline replacement programme brought from five workbooks into one record per well: risk, service test, replacement scope, construction and handover, planned against actual.
Met4 of 4 success criteriaOperator engagementRead the caseMiddle East·Producing field, flow assuranceA written workflow from pressure trend to field confirmation to targeted treatment to post-job review, adopted as the operator's surface scale identification procedure.
Met4 of 4 success criteriaOperator engagementRead the caseA technical question, a train that will not stabilise, a water balance that will not close, a data room that will not reconcile. Describe it in a paragraph and we will propose the scope.
hello@assostechltd.com · 5 South Charlotte Street, Edinburgh, EH2 4AN