Selected work
Fourteen anonymised cases from onshore and offshore fields. Each one says what the setting was, when it was done, and on what basis. Clients, fields and facilities are not named.
Selected work
I14 cases
| No. | Case | Basis | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Field forecast to 2029 with water limitsA three-scenario oil and water forecast across five central processing facilities, with transfer line, facility and disposal limits applied to every well and each well counted once.Met4 of 4 success criteria | Operator engagement | Read |
| 02 | A new 16-inch transfer line, from concept to first flowWe set the concept, worked the design through with the operator and the vendor, wrote the commissioning procedure with five hold points, supported execution and brought the line into service.Met4 of 4 success criteria | Operator engagement | Read |
| 03 | Restarting a processing train in four phasesA plan to bring a train back to about 87 thousand barrels of oil a day and 35 thousand barrels of water, one well at a time, with checks between phases and a hold on any abnormal condition.Met4 of 4 success criteria | Operator engagement | Read |
| 04 | A produced water balance for a water-flooded fieldSeven water streams tracked separately at each facility, disposal headroom taken at actual injection pressure, and the oil effect of each water limit stated.Met4 of 4 success criteria | Operator engagement | Read |
| 05 | Review of a water knockout and treatment conceptAn independent review of a consultant's concept study for free water knockout and produced water treatment at one facility, with a verdict and a numbered list of items to close.Met4 of 4 success criteria | Operator engagement | Read |
| 06 | One record per well for a 68-kilometre flowline programmeA flowline replacement programme brought from five workbooks into one record per well: risk, service test, replacement scope, construction and handover, planned against actual.Met4 of 4 success criteria | Operator engagement | Read |
| 07 | A field procedure for confirming scale before treating itA written workflow from pressure trend to field confirmation to targeted treatment to post-job review, adopted as the operator's surface scale identification procedure.Met4 of 4 success criteria | Operator engagement | Read |
| 08 | P&ID review for additional transfer linesA review of a P&ID package against the statement of requirements for new transfer lines between two facilities. The gap found was between the sheets, not on them.Met4 of 4 success criteria | Operator engagement | Read |
| 09 | One record per well, with source and dateA field data model and browser console joining well status, rates, routing, flowline integrity, service tests, water systems and project delivery, with history kept on every refresh.Met4 of 4 success criteria | Operator engagement | Read |
| 10 | Deferral reporting with an owner and a water columnA deferral register and weekly facility summaries that keep oil separate from liquid, transfers separate from net gains, and every item with an owner and a date.Met4 of 4 success criteria | Operator engagement | Read |
| 11 | Sizing a gas pipeline from the pressure envelopeA concept and pre-FEED study that compared candidate diameters across the full pressure envelope before fixing the line size, and set out the FEED deliverables with the data each needs.Met4 of 4 success criteria | Assos study | Read |
| 12 | Closing the gas balance on a mini-LNG projectFeed composition, liquids recovery, plant fuel, product specification, capital and offtake brought into one study basis and one financial model, with every input marked measured, vendor-stated or assumed.Met4 of 4 success criteria | Assos study | Read |
| 13 | Finding the limit behind the lost barrelsIntegrated well, network and facilities modelling on a mature offshore asset, where the binding limit sat with a different team from the one reporting the loss.Met3 of 3 success criteria | Practitioner experience | Read |
| 14 | Choosing the right well interventionIntervention planning, campaign support and post-job review across water shut-off, scale treatment, stimulation and artificial lift workovers.Met3 of 3 success criteria | Practitioner experience | Read |
Figures in the cases are planning values or dated study inputs and are labelled as such. They are not measured results and they do not imply client endorsement, completed construction or verified production gains.
IIReading the basis labels
What the basis labels mean
Operator engagement
Work done for an operator on a producing field: forecasts, reviews, plans and registers delivered into the operator's own systems and documents. The operator, the field and the facilities are not named.
Assos study
Study, concept or pre-FEED work prepared and issued by Assos Tech to a client under our own document control. The stage is stated. None of it is presented as a built or operating asset.
Practitioner experience
Experience of our senior people gained in previous employment, anonymised. Not an Assos Tech contract. Included to show the depth we bring, not as a company track record.
AssosTech · Energy · Engineering
If one of these looks like your problem
Send us the version you are dealing with. We will tell you what we would do first.
hello@assostechltd.com · 5 South Charlotte Street, Edinburgh, EH2 4AN