Where we work
Three regions, onshore and offshore. Each has a different limit, and the work we are asked for is different in each.
Three regions, onshore and offshore. Each has a different limit, and the work we are asked for is different in each.
Large water-flooded onshore fields with several central processing facilities, high well counts and gathering systems that let wells move between facilities. The limit is more often water than oil.
The engineering problems are brownfield and they arrive at the same time. Processing facilities rebuilt or expanded while producing. Produced water re-injection added in phases. Transfer lines between facilities commissioned. Flowlines reaching end of life on high water cut. Scale restricting chokes. A forecast has to carry facility oil and water limits, transfer line liquid capacities and disposal headroom at the same time, with each well counted once.
Data sit in daily exports, planning files and controlled drawings with different dates. A record that takes each fact from its most authoritative source, with the date, pays for itself quickly. Change runs through a brownfield stage gate process. Commissioning and restart are activities verified in the field, with hold points, not calendar events.
Export routes are shared and can close without notice, so restart planning is a standing capability. A restart written one well at a time, with checks between phases and stop criteria, recovers production faster than an ambitious one that trips.
What we are asked for
A three-scenario oil and water forecast across five central processing facilities, with transfer line, facility and disposal limits applied to every well and each well counted once.
Met4 of 4 success criteriaOperator engagementRead the caseMiddle East·Producing field, water system planningSeven water streams tracked separately at each facility, disposal headroom taken at actual injection pressure, and the oil effect of each water limit stated.
Met4 of 4 success criteriaOperator engagementRead the caseMature platforms, falling production, record decommissioning spend, and asset sales in which the seller keeps part of the well liability. The work is extending production safely and pricing the end of it honestly.
Decommissioning spend reached GBP 2.6 billion in 2025, about half of it on wells. The regulator expects about GBP 3 billion a year from 2026 to 2032, with around 500 inactive suspended wells still waiting for final abandonment (NSTA, UKCS Decommissioning Cost and Performance Update, 13 August 2026). No exploration wells were drilled in 2025 and production has fallen about 40 per cent in five years (OEUK Business Outlook 2026).
For an operator this means integrated asset models on platforms where weight, space and power are fixed, cessation of production planning that follows the economic limit well by well, and a clear view of which interventions still pay. For a buyer or a lender it means technical due diligence that prices water cut, integrity, abandonment and the liability the seller has kept.
Our senior people's operating experience on mature UK assets was gained in previous employment and is labelled as such throughout the site.
| Number to hold | Value | Source, date |
|---|---|---|
| UKCS decommissioning spend, 2025 | GBP 2.6 billion | NSTA, 13 August 2026 |
| Expected annual decommissioning spend, 2026 to 2032 | about GBP 3 billion | NSTA, 13 August 2026 |
| Inactive suspended wells awaiting abandonment | about 500 | NSTA, 13 August 2026 |
| Remaining UKCS decommissioning cost, 2024 prices | GBP 44 billion | NSTA, 2025 update |
What we are asked for
Integrated well, network and facilities modelling on a mature offshore asset, where the binding limit sat with a different team from the one reporting the loss.
Met3 of 3 success criteriaPractitioner experienceRead the caseNorth Sea and Middle East·Intervention planning and operationsIntervention planning, campaign support and post-job review across water shut-off, scale treatment, stimulation and artificial lift workovers.
Met3 of 3 success criteriaPractitioner experienceRead the caseNigeria is moving onshore and shallow water assets to indigenous operators, chasing a gas target it is unlikely to hit on time, and moving from fixed to market gas pricing. Every gas project assumption is in motion.
Nigeria produced about 7.5 billion cubic feet of gas a day in 2025 against a 2030 target of 12. A mid-point review projected only about 1.3 billion cubic feet a day of new production by 2030 against 4.6 planned (Decade of Gas Secretariat, 2026; NRGI as reported by ThisDay, 28 September 2026). About 302 billion cubic feet was flared between January 2025 and June 2026 (NUPRC data as reported, 2026). The 614-kilometre AKK pipeline was reported 95 per cent complete in July 2026. The Ajaokuta mini-LNG cluster, five plants totalling 97 million cubic feet a day, depends on it for feed.
Indigenous operators now produce more than half of the crude after the 2024 and 2025 divestments. They have inherited mature Niger Delta fields with water cut above 50 per cent, carbonate scale and ageing flowlines. The 2026 decommissioning regulations tie approved abandonment plans to annual fund contributions. Reserve-based lending through African development finance institutions is the current funding model, and lenders want the engineering priced.
Our work here is Assos Tech study material: pipeline concepts developed from the pressure envelope, and small-scale LNG balances that separate the screening case from the bankable one, with each input marked as measured, vendor-stated or assumed.
| Number to hold | Value | Source, date |
|---|---|---|
| Nigeria gas production, 2025, against 2030 target | 7.5 against 12 bcf/d | Decade of Gas Secretariat, 2026 |
| Gas flared, January 2025 to June 2026 | about 302 bcf | NUPRC data as reported, 2026 |
| Domestic base gas price for power from 1 April 2026 | USD 2.18 per MMBtu | NMDPRA, 2026 |
| Crude and condensate output, September 2026 | 1.72 million bpd | NUPRC, 2026 |
What we are asked for
A concept and pre-FEED study that compared candidate diameters across the full pressure envelope before fixing the line size, and set out the FEED deliverables with the data each needs.
Met4 of 4 success criteriaAssos studyRead the caseWest Africa·Desktop and pre-FEEDFeed composition, liquids recovery, plant fuel, product specification, capital and offtake brought into one study basis and one financial model, with every input marked measured, vendor-stated or assumed.
Met4 of 4 success criteriaAssos studyRead the caseIf your asset is in one of these places, send us the decision you face. If it is somewhere else, send it anyway. The method travels.
hello@assostechltd.com · 5 South Charlotte Street, Edinburgh, EH2 4AN