Conclusion
The objective was to stop treating wells on a pressure trend alone. It was achieved. The work order now requires a confirmed cause, every treatment carries an expected recovery and a post-job comparison, recurring wells are on inhibitor and interval plans, and the procedure is the operator's controlling document at revision 3.
| Success criterion | Met | How it was achieved |
|---|
| iNo flush or chemical treatment raised without a confirmed cause on the work order | Met | Work order template changed to require the confirmation step; alternative causes recorded on every order |
| iiEach treatment carries an expected rate recovery and a post-job comparison | Met | Post-job review template issued and completed for each treatment |
| iiiRecurring wells on a control plan rather than a reactive list | Met | Recurring wells moved to inhibitor and interval plans |
| ivProcedure adopted by operations as the controlling document | Met | Procedure issued as the operator's surface scale identification procedure, revision 3 |